Dubai Jobs

This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Showing posts with label Pervez Musharraf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pervez Musharraf. Show all posts

Saturday

President Zardari? Tested Soon, Tested Heavily

If a nation is genetically strong, not only will it survive, it will also grow stronger and more vital through trial and error. If not, it will die anyway, whatever you do. That's the way it is. The graveyards of the world are littered with the debris of civilizations, empires, superpowers and states long gone. Given the ground realities, the new leaders of Pakistan will be tested soon, and tested heavily. It is Mr. Zardari's right to be the next president because the people gave his party the most seats. He deserves it and the people deserve him. But will he give up politics to become neutral or will he appoint someone else to be our next Head of State as President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, Commander-in-Chief of the Army, Navy and Air Force and symbol of the unity of the Federation and continuity of the State?

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—‘It may happen that you will hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that you will love a thing which is evil for you. God knows, and you know not.’ Al-Quran (2:216).

The inquisition ended before the impeachment could begin. Pervez Musharraf belongs to history now. History, however, is rarely accurate. It depends on who writes it. Only the Almighty is the final judge. He knows best.

Nothing is permanent, except the Almighty. All things come to an end, good or bad. Let the dead past bury its dead. Let those who belong to it worry about it. Look to the present – and the future. The new question now is: Musharraf may belong to history, but where does Pakistan belong? Where will it belong in a year? Where will it belong when the biggest of all the post-Cold War convulsions yet to come has consumed itself and the world finds a new equilibrium? Alive and kicking? On life support? Or …?

The answer lies in the hands of two unlikely men. Can they rise to the occasion? We won't have long to wait. They have played the game before and failed under much easier circumstances. This is not a facetious statement. The victors have always reshaped the world after the end of every world war. The Cold War was actually the Third World War, the longest in history. The instant it was over the map of the world started changing. The Soviet Union collapsed into numerous independent states, some still in the process of being shaped, others yet to find equilibrium. Germany, divided after World War II, was reunified as the Cold War petered out. East Europe found new shape and new doctrines. The process has still neither peaked nor culminated, not until those countries of the Middle East, South Asia and Africa that were crafted by the victorious colonizers after the first two World Wars are reshaped again to meet the needs and demands of the new victor.

After the First World War we saw the emergence of Saudi Arabia, modern Turkey, Jordan, and Iraq. The seeds of Israel were sown with the Balfour Declaration. After the Second World War came rapid decolonization and we saw the emergence of Pakistan and later Bangladesh, India, Israel, the emergence of a victorious and independent communist China, so many African countries with their borders drawn in straight lines cutting across tribes.

Both times the victors parceled out the world amongst themselves, especially the division of the European spoils, with east Europe going to the communist Soviet bloc and west Europe to the capitalist U.S. bloc.

Now there is only one victor, so it is easier to refashion the world to his needs, with no tiresome allies to share the spoils with. But this will never bring peace. It never has, it never will. Peace will only come when the obvious choice finally dawns on the world: co-existence or no existence. This is the context in which the latest rulers of Pakistan have to operate.

It is good that Musharraf decided not to fight it out. He could have used strong-arm methods constitutionally and legally. But the country would have gone into a greater tailspin; greater perhaps than it's fragile unity could bear. His was a decision based on wisdom made by a very patriotic man.

He left with dignity after making a dignified speech. I am particularly happy because finally a suggestion of mine has been accepted: don't abort the learning process again. The people have sown their seeds. Now they have to reap the harvest. This is the imperative. Else they won't move on. Unless they do, they will never learn to sow better seeds to reap a better harvest in future. It's called growing up, evolving, maturing. Who said it's not a painful process?

If an entity is genetically strong, not only will it survive, it will also grow stronger and more vital through trial and tribulation. If not, it will die along the way anyway, whatever you do. That's the way it is. The graveyards of the world are littered with the debris of civilizations, empires, superpowers and states long gone.

Given the ground realities, the new leaders of Pakistan will be tested soon, and tested heavily. It is Mr. Zardari's right to be the next president because the people gave his party the most seats. He deserves it and the people deserve him.

But will he give up politics to become neutral or will be appoint someone else to be our next Head of State as President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, Commander-in-Chief of the Army, Navy and Air Force and symbol of the unity of the Federation and continuity of the State?

As people's living conditions deteriorate with rising prices, as gas and electricity become increasingly scarce and more expensive, and as the security situation worsens, with large swathes of the country outside the government's writ and under the control of warlords and terrorists of various hues, as some areas already are, the army will again be asked, from within and without, to intervene and stop the rot, even if it is not inclined to.

But history has shown that the army can stop the rot only for a time. The process that is programmed in a nation's genes and a country's DNA can only be delayed, not halted or reversed. That can only happen in the very rare event that there is a revolution.

Thus they should not waste time in chasing relatively irrelevant issues driven by huge egos. The first and foremost priority is to provide security to the citizens and the wherewithal for a decent survival at the very least. When one reads about fathers committing suicide because they cannot feed their children, mothers selling their toddlers for a pittance out of sheer hopelessness, hundreds of families left without breadwinners because of the satanic doings of terrorists, the fate of a handful of judges pales into insignificance, or hounding Pervez Musharraf for that matter just to satisfy bloodlust.

Those who wish to hound him should remember Jesus: ‘He who is without sin should cast the first stone.’

And they should also remember what God has said in the Quran: "I bestow honor on whom I wish and dishonor on whom I wish.’

SAVING PAKISTAN

The entity we call Pakistan and which is dearer to us than life itself can only be saved by three means. One, a revolution led by men with depth, vision and a native but coherent ideology and with the people behind them. Our genes have shown no such propensity.

The second is to submit to America entirely. Forget Kashmir, recognize Israel, give up all nuclear assets and downsize your armed forces to a token level. Then see how the mare goes. But first decide whether there is self-esteem in this.

The third and preferred path to salvation lies in wisdom. Wisdom demands that regardless of numbers, our rulers should put aside their differences and get together to form a national government in which every region, province, ethnicity, language and sect is represented to work together to take the country out of the perfect storm it is engulfed in.

Sadly, wisdom is also something that has passed us by entirely, more even than our propensity to revolution.

The Greeks said, ‘Those whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.’

Our people are not mad; they are desperate. They are desperate because the choices before them are all anchored in past military regimes, their leaders (and their continuation) born of military patronage. If they had a fresh new choice anchored in the people, without doubt they would decide sensibly. There is vacuum for a new political force to emerge and fill. A force that is anchored in a native ideology and rooted in the land and its people.

‘Let there be a community from among you that invites to all that is good, and enjoins the doing of what is [known by common sense and sound minds to be] right, and forbids the doing of what is [known by common sense and sound minds to be] wrong, and it is they who attain to success." [3:104].

This is advice from the Almighty to form groups, associations, political parties and the like to take the initiative to invite people to the good, enjoin them to get on the correct path and forbid that which is evil. This is also one of the prime duties of rulers and leaders.

When in trouble, seek guidance from that pure and pristine spring from which the River of God flows. "And incline not toward those who do wrong, lest the Fire should touch you, and you have no protectors other than Allah, nor you would then be helped." [11:113].

‘And devour not one another's possessions wrongfully, nor offer them to those who rule, so as to wrongly and knowingly devour what is owned by others." [2:188].

This verse on corruption applies not just to rulers but also as importantly, if not more, to the ruled as well, to those who corrupt rulers. Punishment equally harsh awaits the corrupters and those who spread corruption through the land by corrupting rulers by seducing them and exploiting their weaknesses.

Wednesday

One Elected President, Two Unelected Politicians

http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w17/img.205753_t.jpghttp://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/images/Pervez%20Musharraf-58139.jpg

One Elected President, Two Unelected Politicians



In Beijing, world celebrates human achievement while in Islamabad we are stuck with politics

I wish our people and our leaders would understand that having political differences should not stand in the way of appreciating progress

Thanks to President Musharraf export revenue more than doubled, foreign direct investment increased from a meager $1 billion to $8 billion, and the Karachi stock exchange was widely touted as one of the best performing markets in the world.

This is a man who gave Pakistan a free television news culture and oversaw the freest election in our history.

This is a manufactured political crisis that will embolden Pakistan's ill-wishers and will sadly assure foreign investors that Pakistan is no place for their business.


ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—At the dawn of the Beijing Olympics, talk of Pakistan
's chances at field hockey glory have taken a back seat to the de-facto national sport: Politics.

Beyond the hype, it's time to take a moment and examine the situation. It seems as if the nearly divorced coalition has decided to stick together in pursuit of the President's impeachment.

One would be convinced of their genuine commitment, if not for the fact that the last such joint press briefing was to announce the Murree Declaration, now defunct.

But it's important to look behind this smokescreen. After all, why would it take marathon talks if there weren't serious problems behind the scenes?

Farooq Naik, the law minister, was kicked out of the talks—twice.

According to a report in the Daily Times, Shahbaz Sharif felt that Naik could not be trusted amidst the Sindh High Court judges’ fiasco, and asked Zardari to remove him from the negotiations not only in the Prime Minister's House, but also at Zardari House.

I suppose it’s acceptable in political circles to ask your host to kick out his own guest.

In any case, a draft was agreed upon and presented to the nation for all to see. On the face of it, the case seems compelling for the common man: Musharraf has acted unconstitutionally, is responsible for the economic crisis, and he must go in order for democracy to flourish. A legal expert would be needed to examine the complex constitutional question, such as if the PCOs of 1999 and 2000 (both validated by the Supreme Court) are fair game for impeachment.

As for the economy and the democracy argument, things are a bit clearer.

It is hard to dismiss the vast economic improvements of Pakistan since 1999, and to float it as possible grounds for impeachment is laughable. Almost every major macro-economic indicator points to the economic turnaround of the past decade. Even if the 20-fold increase in foreign reserve levels can be whisked away as a byproduct of foreign aid, what about the results? On the business side, export revenue more than doubled, foreign direct investment increased from a meager $1 billion to $8 billion, and the Karachi stock exchange was widely touted as one of the best performing markets in the world. The National Commission for Human Development was conceived, helping achieve poverty reduction, a rise in literacy, and a 600% increase in funds for development programs. I wish our people and our leaders would understand that having political differences should not stand in the way of appreciating progress and pursuing our national interests; the economy being supreme.

As for democracy, it seems ironic that an elected President who oversaw the fairest elections in
Pakistan's recent history is being cited as a hindrance for democracy by two unelected politicians.

But even more important is the fact that the duly elected Prime Minister, as well as the leading party's president (also an elected member of parliament) were both not present in the talks.

Makhdoom Amin Fahim has gone as far as to publicly separate himself from the Government, denounce the march to impeachment, and plead the Government to take notice of a very serious and rapidly deteriorating security and economic situation. He supposedly has even met with PML-Q leadership, which must have political analysts grabbing their calculators to re-analyze the number game in the event of some treasury members abstaining from an impeachment vote.

Critics of President Bush often rightfully say that the war in
Iraq
was a "war of choice." The impeachment saga is no different. In the face of unprecedented security threats in the tribal belt, with growing reports of foreign interference to destabilize the country, and an ever-worsening economy, this manufactured political crisis will embolden Pakistan's ill-wishers, and will sadly assure foreign investors that Pakistan is no place for their business.

No matter how impeachment goes, no one seems to win, as
Pakistan is definitely the one to lose. Let's hope at least our Olympic team can change that.

Thursday

Solid Alliance Pervez Musharraf - George W Bush (Ben Heine)

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1101/1360093339_0037eadeba.jpg?v=0

Solid Alliance Pervez Musharraf - George W Bush (Ben Heine)


Pakistan’s president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, acknowledged publicly August 12 that Taliban forces are using Pakistan’s border region as a base from which to launch attacks against U.S. and NATO troops occupying Afghanistan.

“There is support from these areas to Taliban activity inside Afghanistan,” said Musharraf in a joint appearance with Afghan president Hamid Karzai at the closing session of a four-day gathering in Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, where 600 tribal leaders from both sides of the border participated. “There is no doubt Afghan militants are supported from Pakistani soil,” he said.

Until July, Pakistani officials were still denying U.S. claims that al-Qaeda and Taliban forces were operating from Pakistan. The government in Islamabad, under pressure from Washington, abandoned its support for the Taliban in 2001 to become a U.S. ally. But it has held back from blocking Taliban activity in its territory. In Pakistan “sections of the military regard the predominantly Pashtun fighters [of the Taliban] as a useful means of retaining influence,” the Financial Times noted August 8.

The U.S.-backed conference was billed by the big-business media as a step toward improving relations between two of Washington’s key allies in the so-called war on terror. They also sought to use it to undermine support for Taliban and al-Qaeda among local tribal groups.

Washington and its imperialist allies are pressing the Pakistani government to show results on its pledge to combat “terrorism.” Since July, Islamabad has deployed tens of thousands of troops to Waziristan, on the northwestern border with Afghanistan, and has launched attacks that have killed dozens of Taliban fighters.

While stressing its preference of collaborating with the Musharraf government, the White House has left open the prerogative of taking further military action unilaterally. U.S. president George Bush said at an August 9 news conference that he expected Musharraf’s “full cooperation in sharing intelligence” on suspected al-Qaeda and Taliban activities and “swift action taken if there is actionable intelligence on high-value targets.”

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama went further, saying on August 8, “If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and president Musharraf won’t act, we will.” “We can’t send millions and millions of dollars to Pakistan for military aid and be a constant ally to them and yet not see more aggressive action in dealing with al-Qaeda,” Obama said a week later.

Washington’s demands that Musharraf crack down on al-Qaeda and the Taliban have sharpened the political crisis facing the military leader.

Faced with strong opposition from inside and outside of government, including from Washington, Islamabad backed away August 9 from imposing a state of emergency that “would have given Musharraf sweeping powers to restrict freedom of movement and assembly, and could have extended for another year the term of the current parliament, which is viewed as pro-Musharraf,” the Washington Post reported.

“We are against the imposition of emergency. If Musharraf does so, we will oppose it, and let me make it clear that there is no justification for it,” said Syed Kabir Ali Wasti of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Q party, according to the Post. He said Musharraf was only interested in “ protecting his own interests.”

In face of reports that Musharraf was considering the imposition of a state of emergency U.S. secretary of state Condoleezza Rice made a quick phone call to the Pakistani leader August 9.

“ President Musharraf and the Pakistani government have… demonstrated that they want to cooperate within its laws and Pakistan’s constitution,” said U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack at a news briefing later that day.

Saturday

Musharraf rules out Resignation


Musharraf Rules Out resignation in Current Scenario!

ISLAMABAD: President Pervez Musharraf said that he could not resign in current situation and if anyone wants to impeach, there is constitutional procedure available for it.

Talking to senior journalists here on Saturday, Musharraf said that political and economical situation of the country is worst and he is always talking about reconciliation.

Replying to a question about using 58-2B, President said that he does not want to discuss other option.

When asked about whether he would opt the option of resignation or use 58-2B if he feels that present government has failed, Musharraf said he does not want to discuss the other option.

If parliament could seize his powers, whether he wants to continue as president, Musharraf said that he would take the decision when the moment comes. He said that he would respect the decision of parliament.

About impeachment, the president said if anyone wants to impeach him, there is a constitutional procedure. He extended his cooperation to the prime minister.

Rejecting Dr. Qadeer’s statement that he was pressurized; Musharraf said that Pakistan had faced embarrassment because of him.

Regarding anti-Musharraf statements issued by retired generals, he said that he could also talk against them but couldn’t.

Musharraf has termed the Balochistan situation as uncertain.